ANSWERS To Tough Wine Questions

The recent Fermentation Survey on "Tough Wine Questions" was issued to to look at questions about wine that interest me as a marketer. In this post I want to deliver an overall look at what the 238 folks who answered the survey had to say.

ON TERROIR
For the avid wine drinker and wine enthusiast the question of Terroir looms large. Without it there really is little meaning to our relationship with wine since if all wine is the same, no matter where it is grown, well, then who cares.

I asked you to identify which statement best describes your own understanding of the concept of terroir. 70% said:

"The influence that the entire natural environment (soil, climate, slope, rain, etc) has on the character of a wine."

This is a New World concept of terroir insofar as it tends to give equal weight to both climate and soil. In Europe you are far more likely to see soils given more credit for the character of the wine. Also, you will see deference given to local and regional winemaking traditions in any descriptions of terroir. These two descriptions of terroir were given by 11% of respondents respectively.

OLD VINES
In my mind, the term "Old Vine" is among the most abused and misunderstood terms you will ever see on a label. What constitutes "old vines" and what character do they add to a wine? I didn’t examine the latter, but only the former in this survey when I asked what criteria should exist for labeling a wine "Old Vine?"

38% said the vines should be 40 years or older, while 28% said 60 years or older. Upwards of 78% or respondents believed the vines producing the grapes for a wine labeled "Old Vine" should be older than 40 years.

HIGH ALCOHOL WINES
There is a debate in the industry right now as to whether the current concern often expressed in the wine industry over higher and higher alcohol wines will eventually trickle down to the consumer who will then reject them. It’s definitely an open question. In this survey I wanted to know how Fermentation readers responded to high alcohol wines.

You are aware of them. Over 80% of you say that wines have drifted up in alcohol content over the past few years. However, over 50% of you say you either "Don’t Mind" them or "Like them". 35% of you say you react to these wines either by not liking them or by not buying them.  Another 7% of you think high alcohol wines are hurting the wine industry.

WINE RATINGS
There is a significant split among Fermentation Readers over the utility and impact of numerical wine ratings. Half say they are useful in helping choose a wine to buy, while half say they are of no value. Half of you say they are hurting the wine industry while half say they are making wine more accessible to more people, something that is clearly beneficial to the wine wine industry.

Now here’s something very interesting: Nearly 80% of respondents believe that numerical wine ratings promote sameness in wine. Less than 1% of respondents believe numerical wine ratings promote a diversity of style in wine.

DEMOGRAPHICS
You are overwhelmingly male. You are likely by a margin of over 80% to have an undergraduate college degree or better. You are likely to be middle aged. You probably live on the East or West coast. Well over half of you have an annual household income of $100K and….. more than half of you work in the wine industry or an industry that serves the wine industry in some capacity.

I have more to say on these findings. There are some very interesting nuggets when you break down the questions and parse them. They also give rise to some very interesting questions, which I will be raising in later posts.

In the mean time, you can view the results of the Survey HERE.


8 Responses

  1. Jack - November 27, 2006

    Alcohol: “35% of you say you react to these wines either by not liking them or by not buying them.” Pretty significant! That means ALREADY 1 out of 3 (of your respondents) rejects high alcohol wines.
    Wine ratings: “Nearly 80% of respondents believe that numerical wine ratings promote sameness in wine.” How can it not?

  2. tom - November 27, 2006

    Jack:
    I don’t think numerical ratings MUST promote sameness in wine. However, I think they do, too.
    There are those out there using numerical rating systems that do try hard to take into account the regional differences, and thus promote diversity of style. It’s just that very few seem to do this. The result is numbers fostering sameness.

  3. Dr. Debs - November 27, 2006

    I’ve been looking forward to these results, Tom. Disappointed in the male/female ratio, though. And given your other post about the Spectator Top 100, I find the results on the ratings very interesting.

  4. Jack - November 27, 2006

    But Tom, the numerical ratings from just a tiny few peoiple are what we’re talking about. Are you telling me that wineries aren’t crafting wine so that (either) Robert Parker and James Laube give it a high score? And that absolutely promotes sameness in wine. The “got to score 90 pts or else” is the goal for most wineries.

  5. Mike - November 27, 2006

    Question 4 raises a methodological issue. I think it would have been interesting to split personal reactions to high-alcohol wines and concerns over their impact on the industry into two questions. For example, I could answer that I don’t seek out high-alcohol wines, but I think they’re good for the industry, because their big fruit make them more accessible to new drinkers.

  6. Doc Russ - September 3, 2007

    Q..
    As an amateur wine maker for the past year am proud to say I have made some pretty good wines. However I just pressed out some home grown Catobwa gapes right of the vine with a SG of 1.080 I added 5 orange skins and two lime skins, 24 oz raisins and D-47 yeast to 6 gal of must. The PH was 2.93 and the Ta was 10. it took 10 cc of sodium hydroxide to get the PH meter to read 8.2 (yek)
    I would like to get my PH in the range of 3.2 + – and the TA down to .65
    The must is boiling right now @64f.
    So how do I go about the adjustments?
    Can I add potassium carbonate, when and how much or
    can I add calcium carbonate, when and how much?
    Thank you
    Doc Russ……….

  7. Doc Russ - September 3, 2007

    Q..
    As an amateur wine maker for the past year am proud to say I have made some pretty good wines. However I just pressed out some home grown Catobwa gapes right of the vine with a SG of 1.080 I added 5 orange skins and two lime skins, 24 oz raisins and D-47 yeast to 6 gal of must. The PH was 2.93 and the Ta was 10. it took 10 cc of sodium hydroxide to get the PH meter to read 8.2 (yek)
    I would like to get my PH in the range of 3.2 + – and the TA down to .65
    The must is boiling right now @64f.
    So how do I go about the adjustments?
    Can I add potassium carbonate, when and how much or
    can I add calcium carbonate, when and how much?
    Thank you
    Doc Russ……….

  8. steve glickman - November 14, 2007

    Many expensive restaurants & many wine lovers/
    experts appear indifferent to serving/drinking
    better/expensive reds at high temperatures?
    i.e., would you consume a $100. at 70 degrees?
    a $50. at 75? Thanks/confounded Steve


Leave a Reply