Who Owns The Reputation of a Wine Region?

WneWaiterSteve Heimoff recently wrote about the controversy over ICANN, one of the organizing bodies of the Internet, and their intent to issue a .Wine and .Vin web domain for use. These two new domain names will be issued along with hundreds of others such as .Art, .Blog, .Auto, etc. A number of countries as well as regional wine associations oppose the issuance of .Wine and .Vin.

Recently a variety of regional wine associations including those representing wineries in Napa Valley, Willamette Valley, Oregon, Walla Walla and others issued a statement strongly condemning the issuance of the .Wine and .Vine domains. The reasons they gave in their press release went thusly:

“non-existent to grossly insufficient safeguards from illegitimate companies hijacking the history of fine winemaking in America and the rigorous, multi-generational efforts that have gone into creating, promoting and protecting quality winemaking regions across the country.”

“If granted to unscrupulous bidders, second-level domain names such as napavalley.wine or wallawalla.wine could be held in perpetuity by a company or individual that has never seen a vineyard, cultivated fine wine grapes or made a single bottle of wine.”


“Fine wine consumers could be deceived into believing that they are visiting a website associated with a genuine product exhibiting the specific qualities and unique characteristics of a growing region, when they are in fact being influenced by an imitator who happened to be the highest bidder for that particular domain name.” 

As Steve Heimoff wrote, it’s a “Sticky Wicket”.

Now, I understand the problem with someone not associated with the real companies using the .Wine domain to register something like “Robertmondavi.wine” or “Chateaustmichelle.wine “or “fermentationwineblog.wine”. What I don’t see as a problem worthy of scuttling the .Wine or .Vin domains is someone registering “NapaValleyWine.Wine” or “OregonWineries.Wine” or “WallaWallaWineCountry.Wine and doing with them whatever they choose.

The reputation and the history of a wine region belongs to no one. While I can understand why the folks in the Willamette Valley might be opposed to someone registering “WillametteValleyWine.Wine” they spending countless hours publishing information that amounted to “Willamette Valley wines really suck and their terroir is terrible”, there really ought not be anything to stop a person from doing this. And this is what the collection of regional wine associations that came out against .Wine and .Vin are worried about happening.

Furthermore, registering the URL “NapaValleyWineries.Wine” and holding on to it in perpetuity by a Pepsi-drinking, wine hating gal from Sweden isn’t against the law either, nor should it be. The .Wine domain has no business being reserved for use by people who have the kind of wine knowledge deemed appropriate by someone.

Finally, if any website with a .Wine suffix is trying to sell wine by identifying it from a region that it does not originate from, that website won’t stay in business very long. But you don’t scuttle the .Wine or .Vin domains because of this possibility.

Keep in mind any of dishonest things the regional wine associations worry about happening upon the issuance of the .Wine and .Vin domains could just as easily happen with the .Art, .Blog, .Auto or any other domain. The potential for dishonesty in the realm of the online wine world does not begin and end with the .Wine and .Vin domains.

In the end the problem is that no one can trademark “Napa Valley” or “Walla Walla” or “Willamette Valley”. Were this possible, then the trademark holder would have the right to protest the issuance of a NapaValleywine.Wine URL. As mentioned before, no one owns the history, the legacy, the reputation or the name of a wine region.

8 Responses

  1. Ben - July 8, 2014

    Amen, Tom. Great post. The “marketplace” will sort out the legit from the impostor. No need to begin down the slippery slope. A wine region’s reputation has little to do with a domain and everything to do with the media, public perception and the history which already exists there. Quality moves the needle. Perceived quality builds and solidifies a reputation.

  2. Ziggy - July 8, 2014

    Tom, I totally agree with your assessment.
    It’s “User Beware” whether it’s .Wine or .Garbage.

  3. El Jefe - July 8, 2014

    Agreed. And probably the most spirited bidding will not even be wine related: s.wine and t.wine. Should be fun.

  4. Christopher Donatiello - July 8, 2014

    Never underestimate the public’s lack if knowledge. I was at Pebble Beach F&W representing the Russian River Valley. Even with a fairly wine savvy crowed I had 2 consumers come up to try the “wine from Russia”

  5. Wine Roland - July 21, 2014

    I wrote a like-this post in my blog; I’ve made a fast search for franciacorta.it or barolo.it and similar. Well, unfortunately none of this exist, not even franciacorta.com or barolo.com, or they are sites not linkable to the original name. Napavalley.com is a good site, but NapavalleyWine.com don’t exists (it’s free for sale).

  6. t25 - July 22, 2014

    very positive focus t25 video and enthusiastic,In order to ensure the smooth conduct focus t25 reviews of the t25 conference669 square meters, focus t25 ebay please indicate the source. Zhu? the Austrians t25 Reruhi first t25 workout time skiing this winter sports brought to Niigata. Following the micro-channel

Leave a Reply